As the consumer needs or the sales
platforms changed, so did the methodology to create the lifestyle brands.
Lifestyle Brands started to take prominence 25 years back. And since then,
every 5 years, the brand building process has become more challenging.
While there could be deviations,
however, here is how the majority of the brands saw their success.
Quality:
Most powerful brands, especially in the apparel / lifestyle stage, have been around for 20 odd years. That was the time, where brands were made by offering tangible quality better than the unorganized market. Quality was the main differentiator!
Arrow came from Arvind Mills,
Louis Phillippe, VanHeusen, Allen solly came from Coats Viella, a yarn
company. The strength to leverage for brands was the ability to produce better
quality. Other examples being FabIndia, Bata, Muftijeans, Adidas, Park
Avenue, Colour plus, etc.
Quality + Price:
Consumers assumed quality as a given
aspect of a brand. Then they started to seek quality at an attractive price. 10-15
years back, national Brands were created through an anchor of price.
Large format stores played a large role
in the same. Melange, rangmanch, CODE, Aurelia, Duke, campus, Peter England,
John Players etc emerged and became prominent brands quickly.
Quality + Price + Convenience:
Ecommerce came into India about a
decade back. It was a new and powerful channel of sales. Growing at a very fast
pace. And still expected to grow at 25% CAGR for next couple of years. It
opened another platform for Brands to be created.
Next set of brands are coming from the ecom sector. Where the large opportunity gave wings to labels who were
willing to make fashionable supplies, at attractive prices, and help consumers
look good. They relied on the styling, fashion, better looks over better
quality etc. Wrogn, Shree, Asin, HRX, Roadster, Imara, Symbol, Abof ,
Anouk, etc. And these brands became large and desired in a very short period of
time.
Quality + Price + Convenience + Instant
Fashion.
Consumers got more educated and more
demanding. They were expecting the hot fashion off the ramp walks, in their
wardrobes in no time. Data centric, AI driven brands started to show up.
The Task was tough. Yet, markets
responded and created a very nimble and agile supply chain which was ready to
experiment with smaller quantities and then make larger quantities of best
sellers. India brought real fast fashion to their consumers. And these brands
were able to give a tough fight to international brands/ formats. Now the
fashion has become instant. Faballey, Indya, Moda Rapido, Highlander, Tokio
Talkies, 20 Dresses, The garage company etc.
Quality + Price + Convenience + Instant Fashion + Community endorsement.
With such rapid influx and creations of
brands, and the incessant messages, notifications, pop ups, consumers have
become confused and suspicious, as to whom to trust and what to buy.
Efficacy of direct marketing has
dropped and surrogate / indirect marketing has improved. Influencer marketing,
user generated content, Video commerce, Live commerce, social commerce are all
originating from the need of consumers to get suggestions from people they can
trust.
They could be fashion experts with a
fan following upto a million. Or designers with a couple of millions of insta
followers, or tik tok / chingari artists, who in pursuit of promoting
themselves also promote the brands as well… Friends also take opinions on
whatsapp / social media… Collaborative buying is the new trend.
Shien is a one of the glaring examples. 13b worth of sales, and more than 100b market capitalization. Shien created an agile supply chain of fast fashion and then leveraged social video platforms, Tik Tok, YouTube, Influencer Instagram to become a brand / site of choice. It’s banned in India. However in the US, every third person is an active user.
Large ecom portals have invested into
social commerce, like Meesho, Dal share, M Studio by Myntra etc. Also,
last year Nov, M live by Myntra started to attract consumers, Flipkart
came into Video commerce through Moj etc, early this year.
In these times, chances are that the
Brand's life is shorter. And the brands would emerge faster. However they may
give space to new brands quickly. So, what would be needed?
Brands would have to develop deep
insight in storytelling, community building, consumer service, brand with
purpose and consumer generated content which should be authentic and raw.
Brands would have to learn new ways to land an enticing story with the
consumer. And the story which consumers can be proud of.
Brands would also have to keep on
developing a supply chain which is Nimble, cost effective and maybe digitized.
Given the amount of developmental work required, either brands would have to
invest in the designing and sampling facility or enroll and enable the
manufacturers to do the same. Speed has become immensely important.
Indian factories have not invested
enough in the capability of quick and wide sampling and smaller lines. And
hence there are few factories which are gaining from their professional / new
adaptive approach. Factories can possibly create agile setups which cater to
this demand.
It’s difficult to replicate the Shien
model in India, because of the limitation of an inflexible supply chain.
India has shown incredible innovation
in ethnic space, from Surat, Jaipur, Kolkata…. However, quality and consistency remain a concern. In my personal view, If these sectors also build
predictability of quality and delivery, India will churn out a couple of very large brands in times to come.
Metaverse has started to impact the
brand creation process. And the digital avatars of Models, garments may end up
creating new ways of digital brand creation. Perhaps, Future of brand
creation would be even more fun and interesting.

No comments:
Post a Comment